---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Matthew Cope <matthew.g.cope@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:33 AM
Subject: Matthew Cope
To: seth weidenaar <sweidenaar@rcsnm.org>
FF
From: Matthew Cope <matthew.g.cope@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:33 AM
Subject: Matthew Cope
To: seth weidenaar <sweidenaar@rcsnm.org>
FF
1. 2nd sentence is the thesis.. It is pretty good
2. Imagery hyperbole allusion details
Quote- yes
Mildly convincing.. There was more and stronger evidence
3. Yes and yes
4. 5-6
LLLL
1. 1st sentence, repeats the prompt, is an OK thesis
2. Imagery, details, hyperbole
Quote- yes
Imagery is convincing, detail and hyperbole is not
3. Evidence- no, snapshot- kind of
4. 4-5
I mostly agree to this review, specifically on questions 1, 3, and 4. However, I somewhat think that the detail and hyperbole is convincing because it shows how quickly and drastically Victor jumps to conclusions. Victor drives himself to guilt with his own thoughts and that is shown in the quotes.
ReplyDelete