---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Hannah Sowers <hannahsowers97@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:37 AM
Subject: Hannah Sowers
To: seth weidenaar <sweidenaar@rcsnm.org>
FF:
From: Hannah Sowers <hannahsowers97@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:37 AM
Subject: Hannah Sowers
To: seth weidenaar <sweidenaar@rcsnm.org>
FF:
1."He is terrified and shaken and the reader can see that through the imagery, selection of details, hyperbole, and allusions Shelly provides in the passage" I give it a 4 out of 5
2. The writer uses a lot of evidence to support its thesis. He or she has quotes for each literary device asked for in the prompt and thesis. They then go on to explain how the evidence fits into their argument. The evidence is very convincing
3. It has a conclusion that sums up the evidence but doesn't quite give a snapshot of all the evidence presented.
4. Igive it a 8
LLLL:
1. " Mary Shelley shows that characterization of the narrator, victor frankenstine, through imagery, detail, and hyperbole." I give it a 2 out of 5
2. The writer has pretty good evidence to back up imagery, details and hyperbole it also explains how they fit in.
3. It has a conclusion, however it was not finished. It summarizes pretty good the one thought it has....victor is fearful that turns into madness.
4. I give it a 6
FF: I agree with Hannah for the most part. This essay is very convincing and uses detail very well. However I would give the thesis a 6 and the overall essay an 8 as well.
ReplyDelete